HollyValley SiliconWood

I recently watched the movie Exit Through the Gift Shop from well known artist Banksy. I got a kick out of this film for multiple reasons having liked Banksy's artwork for years now. What most amused me though is how well it goes about making you question what celebrity is and how much you can achieve by becoming famous. The key point for me is questioning whether you really need to be creative and innovative above and beyond being famous. Then Mike Butcher over at Techcrunch went and posted something this morning about start-up teams trumping celebrity tech entrepreneurs. In summary, he too is making the point that execution far outweighs celebrity.

Basically what I'm getting at is all the parallels you're starting to see between the start-up world and the movie business. I am definitely not an expert on the movie business and can only imagine what it's truly like from afar. Yet, we've all seen enough of it to realize a bit how things work in Hollywood. You basically have a couple large companies or studios as they're usually called. There you have management at the top who are the power-brokers in the industry. They back films which are used as vehicles to market actors who either succeed or not. If they do succeed, they are cast in further films and a ton of marketing is thrown at these films, regardless of whether these actors have talent or not. Ultimately, the goal is to make as much money as possible and if you're the one making all this money, keep other people out so you can continue to make as much money as possible. Sure, there are some stand-out actors, managers and studios who go against the grain but basically it's an industry optimized to make money. Simplified by me immensely but I believe you understand what I am saying. 

Now let's switch over to the start-up world. It's no longer Hollywood and we're now a bit north in Silicon Valley. You have a couple firms who call all the shots and are known as Tier 1 VC's (with some major players like Google, Apple and Facebook thrown in for good measure). These VC's fund firms instead of films run by entrepreneurs instead of actors. Some of these entrepreneurs are successful and some are not. Those who are get funded further by these Tier 1 firms. Lots of companies are started and sold since these power brokers in the Valley sit on each other's boards and pass deals back and forth. The power brokers continue to make money and those entrepreneurs who don't lead to successful exits get weeded out (where's the reality TV version of "out to pasture" for entrepreneurs?) Ultimately, as in the movie business, you make as much money as possible and keep out the riff-raff who would keep you from making tons of money as long as possible. 

Now don't get me wrong. I am in no way arguing about whether the movie or start-up business is right or wrong or skewed in someone's favor or not. I'm also probably simplifying it too much as well. But the point I am making is that we are in a world where it's about making money. Sure, you can get your touchy-feely on and say you're changing the world but ultimately you wouldn't "work" if it wasn't about making some money. Hence, my advice to any entrepreneur is to take advantage of whatever you have if you ultimately want to be successful. If you are naturally good looking, get your face out there. Be on TV and in the press. If it helps you make money, go for it. At the same time, if media attention doesn't help you make more money, don't focus on it. Get your pretty head down to business and execute like hell to innovate, optimize and sell your product. Or have the best of both worlds. Be a CEO focussed on getting your brand or product out there and have a number two (great blog post by Ben Horowitz) who takes care of business. What you need to focus on is making money and being the scrappy entrepreneur that you are, you'll optimize wherever you can to achieve your goal. 

In the end it's never about who was most popular that determines success. Just think back to all those football players and cheerleaders in high school. (I've seen some of them from my high school....thank you Facebook.....and had a good laugh!) So often there are people you never hear about making tons of cash since they don't need to focus on media. On the other hand, if Twitter/Foursquare/Zynga/Groupon hadn't received so much media attention, you think they'd be where they are now? I highly doubt it and I guarantee you that they had a clear strategy in place to use media (and position their founders) from the start. Hence, don't waste time focussed on the wrong things. If you're a celebrity entrepreneur who's counting his millions hats off to you. If you've become a media darling and are broke, well tough luck kid. Try something new. 

By the way, here's what Exit Through the Gift Shop is about cut and pasted from Wikipedia. Think what you will about whether it's a real story or not but reast assured the dollars earned by "Mr Brainwash" were real!!

Exit Through the Gift Shop: A Banksy Film is a Gonzo Documentary which tells the story of Thierry Guetta, a French immigrant in Los Angeles, and his obsession with street art. It is presented as a documentary, but reviewers have questioned its factuality. The film charts Guetta's constant documenting of his every moment on film, to his chance contact with his cousin, the artist Invader, and his documenting of a host of street artists with focus on Shepard Fairey, and also Banksy though the latter's face is never shown, and his voice is distorted to preserve his anonymity

 

Comments

[IM2SHY]

The headline is a little bit disturbing, I read: "Holly Valance Slicon..."

http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/fan/holly-valance/holly-valance-20040421-618.jpg

[Paul Jozefak]

Perfect, love it! :-)

[Peter D.]

Can you name some celebrity entrepreneurs who failed? would be useful to see what they have done wrong and to see their products. is loic le meur one of them? seesmic is one of the most overrated companies i know. they already changed their company strategy several times. first started with being the twitter for videos, then a social dashboard for everyone and now for companies. don't see any success story behind this product, but loic is trying to be in the media all the time.

[Paul Jozefak]

I wouldn't quite yet say Loic has failed. I am not sure what the outcome for Seesmic will be but rest assured, Loic will be fine. Whether or not Seesmic is successful, Loic works his ass off and makes money wherever he can...see LeWeb and other things he's involved in. Like I said, I am not talking about whether one remains popular. I am taking it to the bottom line and saying you're either making money or not and it doesn't matter whether you are popular. If you are popular and are making good money, as Loic surely is, then you're successful nevertheless.

Celebrity entrepreneurs who failed in my opinion are the founders of boo.com. They were so hyped and where are they now? I may be wrong and they cashed out without us knowing it but to me it seems like they hit their peek and then fell off the face of the earth. It was all hype and no substance. I also think Truphone (now known as Tru) has seen it's peek and is dying a slow death. It may get sold but never will it be a major exit in my opinion. Tons of hype and little growth thereafter. Although I am sure they put a lot of effort into it, I think the hype outweighed the benefit and convenience of the service. This again just proves that a bit more effort in having an amazing product would have taken them further then promoting the hell out of a mediocre product. But who knows, I may be totally wrong on Tru as they are still around.